Assignment of Paper 202: Indian English Literature – Post-Independence
Nation as Narration: Reading Midnight's Children and Deepa Mehta's Earth (1998) through Homi Bhabha's Theory of Postcolonial Nationhood
A Comparative Study of Literary and Cinematic Nation-Narration in Post-Independence Indian English Writing
Academic Details
Name: Kruti.B.Vyas
Roll No.: 13
Enrollment No.:5108250035
Sem.: 3
Batch: 2025 - 2027
E-mail: krutivyas2005@gmail.com
Paper Name: Indian English Literature – Post-Independence
Paper No.: Paper 202
Paper Code: 22407
Unit 2: Salman Rushdie's Midnight's Children (1981)
Topic: Nation as Narration: Reading Midnight's Children and Deepa Mehta's Earth (1998) through Homi Bhabha's Theory of Postcolonial Nationhood
Submitted To: Department of English, Maharaja Krishnakumarsinhji Bhavnagar University, Bhavnagar
Submitted Date:
The following information numbers are counted using QuillBot.
Images: 6
Words: 3178
Characters: 22577
Characters without spaces:19323
Paragraphs: 51
Sentences : 147
Reading time: 12 m 43 s
This paper examines how Salman Rushdie's novel Midnight's Children (1981) and Deepa Mehta's film Earth (1998) construct the Indian nation not as a fixed, essential entity but as an ongoing act of narration. Drawing on Homi K. Bhabha's theorisation of the nation as a "narrative strategy" in "Introduction: Narrating the Nation" and The Location of Culture, the paper argues that both texts stage the birth of independent India and Pakistan through fractured, embodied, and unreliable narrators whose personal histories become inseparable from national history, thereby enacting what Bhabha calls the nation's split between the pedagogical and the performative (Bhabha, Location of Culture 145; Bhabha, "Introduction" 2–3). Reading Rushdie's magical-realist chronicle of Saleem Sinai alongside Mehta's cinematic rendering of Partition violence through the eyes of the child Lenny, the study contends that both works destabilise monolithic nationalist narratives by foregrounding hybridity, ambivalence, and liminal communal identity. Situating these primary texts within existing scholarship on Rushdie, Bhabha, and Partition cinema, the paper concludes that nation, in both works, is less an "imagined community" bound by shared myth (Anderson) than a contested, continually rewritten narrative shaped by memory, trauma, and hybridity.
Nation and Narration; Homi Bhabha; hybridity; ambivalence; Third Space; Midnight's Children; Earth (1998); Partition; postcolonial nationhood; magical realism; pedagogical and performative narrative.
1. How do Rushdie's Midnight's Children and Mehta's Earth (1998) narrativise the birth of the Indian nation as an unstable and ambivalent process rather than a settled historical event?
2. In what ways do the two texts employ Bhabha's concepts of hybridity, liminality, and the split between the "pedagogical" and the "performative" address of the nation?
3. How does the shift from literary to cinematic form affect the representation of nation as narration that is, what does Earth's visual and embodied mode contribute or alter relative to Rushdie's novelistic device of the unreliable narrator?
4. To what extent do both texts trouble Benedict Anderson's notion of the nation as "imagined community" by exposing the exclusions and violence that underlie national belonging?
This paper hypothesises that both Midnight's Children and Earth (1998) resist the idea of the nation as a stable, unified "imagined community" and instead dramatise Bhabha's argument that the nation is constituted performatively through fragmented, ambivalent, and hybrid narratives of individual and communal experience. It further hypothesises that the shift in medium from Rushdie's self-conscious, unreliable literary narration to Mehta's embodied cinematic gaze intensifies rather than diminishes this ambivalence, since both works locate the nation's "originary" moment of Independence and Partition in the traumatised, fragmented body of a child narrator or focaliser.
The postcolonial nation, as it emerges in South Asian writing after 1947, is rarely presented as a settled fact of history. It is, instead, repeatedly re-imagined, re-narrated, and re-contested across literary and cinematic texts that return obsessively to the moment of Independence and Partition. Benedict Anderson's influential account of the nation as an "imagined community," bound together by print capitalism and a shared sense of simultaneity, has long informed postcolonial criticism (Anderson). Yet Homi K. Bhabha's intervention in Nation and Narration and The Location of Culture complicates Anderson's relatively homogeneous model by insisting that the nation is not a stable origin awaiting representation but is itself constituted in and through narration a site of continual ambivalence, splitting, and hybridity (Bhabha, "Introduction" 1–4). This paper reads Salman Rushdie's Midnight's Children (1981) and Deepa Mehta's film Earth (1998) as two exemplary instances of what Bhabha calls "narrating the nation": texts in which the birth of India and Pakistan is inseparable from the fractured, embodied, and often unreliable perspectives of child narrators Saleem Sinai and Lenny Sethna, respectively whose personal traumas become allegories of national rupture.
The choice of these two texts is deliberate. Rushdie's novel is the foundational text of postcolonial Indian English fiction in English and has generated a vast critical apparatus around magical realism, hybridity, and historiographic metafiction, while Mehta's Earth, adapted from Bapsi Sidhwa's Cracking India, translates the same Partition-era anxieties into cinematic form, foregrounding embodiment, communal violence, and the liminal position of the Parsi community. Reading the two together allows this paper to test Bhabha's theory of nation-as-narration across two different media and to ask what changes, and what remains constant, when the nation is narrated on the page as opposed to on the screen.
2. Theoretical Framework: Bhabha's "Nation as Narration"
In his introduction to Nation and Narration, Bhabha argues that the nation should be understood as a form of "narrative strategy" rather than as a natural or organic entity with a fixed essence (Bhabha, "Introduction" 2). The nation, for Bhabha, is always caught in what he calls the ambivalence of its own writing: it presents itself pedagogically, as a continuous, accumulating historical tradition with a clear origin, while simultaneously being performed anew, moment by moment, in the everyday lives and repetitions of its people (Bhabha, Location of Culture 145–46). This split between the pedagogical (the nation as fixed historical object) and the performative (the nation as continually re-enacted process) produces what Bhabha terms the nation's essential ambivalence the sense that national identity is never fully present to itself, but is always in the process of being narrated into being. Hanbeh and Samad's reading of Bhabha's dictum that "nation is narration, narration is nation" underscores precisely this point: national identity is not prior to its telling but is produced by the very act of storytelling, so that literature and film become primary sites where the nation is constructed, contested, and revised (Hanbeh and Samad).
Central to this framework are Bhabha's related concepts of hybridity, liminality, and the Third Space. Hybridity names the way colonial and postcolonial subjects occupy a space "in-between" fixed cultural categories, a space that undermines the colonizer's and the nationalist's shared desire for a pure, bounded identity (Bhabha, Location of Culture). Shaikh and Deshmukh similarly emphasise that Bhabha reads the nation as an inherently unstable signifier, always open to reinscription by minority and marginal voices that the pedagogical, official narrative of the nation would prefer to suppress (Shaikh and Deshmukh). It is this theoretical vocabulary ambivalence, hybridity, the pedagogical/performative split, and the Third Space of enunciation that structures the readings of Midnight's Children and Earth that follow.
3. Midnight's Children: Narrating India's Ambivalent Nationhood
Rushdie's Midnight's Children stages the allegorical coincidence of a single life and national history with unusual literalism: Saleem Sinai is born at the exact midnight of India's Independence on 15 August 1947, and he tells us that he has been "mysteriously handcuffed to history," his "destinies indissolubly chained" to those of his country (Rushdie). This opening gambit appears, at first glance, to install a pedagogical narrative of the nation a single, continuous origin story in which the birth of the child and the birth of the nation coincide perfectly. Yet the novel immediately undercuts this apparent coherence. Saleem is a self-confessedly unreliable narrator who repeatedly admits to errors, embellishments, and outright inventions in his account, so that the very act of narrating the nation becomes visibly unstable, performative, and contingent rather than authoritative. Dwivedi's study of nation and history in the novel argues that Rushdie deliberately fractures the linear, teleological historiography of Indian nationalism, replacing it with a self-consciously partial and subjective chronicle that exposes history itself as a constructed narrative (Dwivedi).
This fracturing operates most vividly through the device of the "midnight's children" themselves the thousand and one children born in the first hour of Independence, each endowed with a magical gift, who telepathically connect across the vast and heterogeneous space of the new nation. Yadav reads this multitude of children as a figure for the irreducible plurality and hybridity of Indian national identity, a plurality that resists any single ethnic, religious, or linguistic definition of "Indianness" (Yadav). Where official nationalist discourse sought to narrate India as a unified pedagogical subject, Rushdie's proliferating, quarrelling, ultimately dispersed children's conference performs the nation's internal difference and eventual disintegration a disintegration that culminates, tellingly, in the historical violence of the Emergency, when many of the children are forcibly sterilised, their magical, hybrid potential literally cut off by the state. Fogel's discussion of magical realism in the novel suggests that this mode is not merely decorative but structurally essential: magical realism allows Rushdie to hold together the empirical and the fantastic, the historical and the mythic, in a single hybrid form that mirrors the hybridity of the nation it represents (Fogel).
Saleem's own body perpetually cracking, disintegrating, and finally "buffeted by too much history" becomes a further site of national allegory. Nikam and Navgire's postmodern reading of the novel emphasises how Rushdie replaces the organic, unified body politic of classical nationalism with a fragmented, wounded, and self-consciously textual body, whose disintegration figures the fissures linguistic, religious, and regional within the postcolonial nation-state (Nikam and Navgire). Rege extends this argument by tracing how Rushdie's novel reconfigures the relationship between individual victimhood and national protagonism established by earlier Indian English fiction, arguing that Saleem is less a heroic embodiment of the nation than an ambivalent, often complicit witness to its violence (Rege). Read through Bhabha's framework, Saleem's narration exemplifies precisely the performative dimension of nationhood: his story does not simply record a pre-existing India but produces, moment by moment, a contested and provisional version of the nation that is always liable to revision, contradiction, and loss. As Luburić-Cvijanović and Muždeka note in their account of Rushdie's trajectory from postmodernism to a more cosmopolitan literary practice, Midnight's Children already anticipates a suspicion of bounded national identity, gesturing instead toward the porous, hybrid, and transnational condition that Bhabha's theory would later formalise (Luburić-Cvijanović and Muždeka).
4. Deepa Mehta's Earth (1998): Partition, Communal Violence, and Fractured Nationhood
If Midnight's Children narrates the nation through the retrospective, self-conscious voice of an adult remembering his childhood, Deepa Mehta's Earth (1998) narrates it through the more immediate, embodied perspective of the child herself. Adapted from Bapsi Sidhwa's novel Cracking India, the film is focalised through Lenny, a young Parsi girl in Lahore whose polio-affected body and consequent partial exclusion from the adult world of political certainty make her an ideal Bhabhian vantage point from which to witness the violent birth of two nations (Earth). The Parsi community that Lenny belongs to occupies precisely the kind of liminal, in-between position that Bhabha associates with hybridity: neither fully assimilated into Hindu, Muslim, or Sikh communal identity nor entirely outside the colonial and national order, the Parsis in Mehta's film inhabit what might be called a Third Space of studied neutrality that Partition violence ultimately renders untenable. Neutill's analysis of embodiment and desire in Sidhwa's novel and Mehta's film argues that Lenny's body, and the bodies of the adults around her, become the terrain on which national and communal boundaries are literally drawn and violently redrawn, so that the domestic and the national, the intimate and the political, become inseparable (Neutill).
Mehta's film is especially attentive to how the pedagogical narrative of a peaceful, harmonious pre-Partition India the world of Lenny's beloved circle of friends from different religious communities is progressively performed into crisis and then catastrophe by the political rhetoric and rumour of Partition. Hasan's reading of the film as "a testimony of communal violence and fanaticism" stresses how Mehta refuses to grant any single community moral high ground, instead depicting the descent into sectarian brutality as a shared, mutually implicating process that shatters the pedagogical fiction of a unified national community even as it is being narrated (Hasan). The character of Dil Navaz, the ice-candy man whose romantic devotion to Lenny's Hindu nanny, Shanta, curdles into betrayal and violence once communal identities harden, dramatises exactly the kind of splitting Bhabha describes: an intimate, hybrid relationship destroyed by the demand that subjects align themselves with a single, pure national-communal identity. Qureshi's account of the film's "discomforting legacy" notes that Earth was itself received ambivalently in India precisely because it refuses easy nationalist consolation, insisting instead on the shared culpability of communities across the new border (Qureshi). Raj and Sreekumar situate Earth within a broader tradition of Bollywood and Indo-Pak Partition cinema that represents displaced and dispossessed subjects, arguing that such films perform an alternative, embodied historiography of Partition that official nationalist narratives on both sides of the border tend to suppress or simplify (Raj and Sreekumar). Williams's discussion of narrative form and silence in Sidhwa's Cracking India further illuminates Mehta's adaptation, showing how the fragmented, elliptical, and often silence-laden narration of trauma in the source novel is translated into the film's visual ellipses and abrupt tonal shifts, reinforcing the sense that the nation's founding violence exceeds any single, coherent narrative frame (Williams).
5. Comparative Analysis: Nation as Narration across Page and Screen
Read together, Midnight's Children and Earth reveal a striking structural convergence: both locate the traumatic, ambivalent birth of the postcolonial nation in the body and voice of a child who is simultaneously inside and outside the adult political world Saleem through his fantastical telepathic gift and his self-conscious narration from a position of physical disintegration, Lenny through her polio-marked body and her liminal Parsi identity. In Bhabha's terms, both figures occupy a Third Space from which the pedagogical certainties of nationalist history can be witnessed, performed, and ultimately unsettled. Neither text offers the nation as Anderson's relatively stable "imagined community" secured by print capitalism and homogeneous empty time; instead, both stage the nation as a wound that is continually reopened by memory and retelling. Varshney's account of the contested meanings of Indian national identity and the politics of Hindu nationalist anxiety provides useful historical grounding here, showing how the very instability that Rushdie and Mehta dramatise at the level of narrative form was, and remains, a live feature of Indian political life rather than a purely literary conceit (Varshney). Chatterjee's argument that the postcolonial nation is best understood not as a single imagined community but as an assemblage of fragments regional, religious, gendered, and communal resonates closely with both texts' refusal of narrative unity, offering a further theoretical bridge between Bhabha's ambivalence and the specific historical fragmentation of the subcontinent (Chatterjee).
At the same time, the shift from novel to film produces important differences in how nation-as-narration is performed. Rushdie's device of the self-consciously unreliable narrator foregrounds the performative instability of the nation at the level of language itself: Saleem repeatedly corrects, doubts, and contradicts his own account, so that the reader is never allowed to mistake his narrative for an authoritative pedagogical history. Mehta's Earth, by contrast, cannot rely on verbal unreliability in the same way; instead, the film performs ambivalence through visual and structural means through Lenny's often uncomprehending gaze, through the film's refusal to villainise any single community, and through abrupt cuts between the intimate, playful world of childhood and the eruption of mob violence. Brown's discussion of hybridity in Rushdie's fiction helps clarify what is distinctive about the novel's strategy: hybridity in Midnight's Children is above all a matter of narrative voice and form a hybridity of English and Indian idiom, of realism and myth whereas in Earth hybridity is primarily embodied and social, located in the mixed, cross-communal friendships that Partition violently dissolves (Brown). In both cases, however, the effect is the same: the nation's originary moment is shown to be irreducibly plural, contested, and traumatic rather than singular, harmonious, and given.
This paper has argued that Salman Rushdie's Midnight's Children and Deepa Mehta's Earth (1998), read through Homi Bhabha's theory of the nation as narration, both refuse the pedagogical fiction of India (and Pakistan) as a unified, coherent "imagined community" secured at the single moment of Independence. Instead, both texts perform Bhabha's insight that "nation is narration, narration is nation" (Hanbeh and Samad), locating the nation's ambivalent, hybrid identity in the fragmented, traumatised bodies and voices of child narrators whose personal histories cannot be disentangled from national history. Rushdie's self-consciously unreliable literary narration and Mehta's embodied cinematic gaze constitute two distinct but complementary strategies for staging this ambivalence, confirming the hypothesis that a shift in medium intensifies, rather than resolves, the instability at the heart of postcolonial nationhood. In demonstrating this convergence across literature and film, the paper affirms the continuing critical value of Bhabha's theoretical vocabulary hybridity, ambivalence, the pedagogical and the performative, the Third Space for reading the post-Independence Indian narrative imagination, and it suggests that the nation, in both Rushdie's and Mehta's hands, remains less a settled inheritance than an unfinished and continually renegotiated act of telling.
Here is the presentation:
Here is the video overview:
Works Cited :
Anderson, Benedict. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Verso, 1983.
Bhabha, Homi K. “Introduction: Narrating the Nation.” Nation and Narration, edited by Homi K. Bhabha, Routledge, 1990, pp. 1–7.
Bhabha, Homi K. The Location of Culture. Routledge, 1994.
Brown, Jessica. East / West: Salman Rushdie and Hybridity. Olivet Nazarene University, 2011. JSTOR, https://jstor.org/stable/community.37867668.
Chatterjee, Partha. The Nation and Its Fragments: Colonial and Postcolonial Histories. Princeton UP, 1993.
Dwivedi, O. P. “Nation and History: A Postcolonial Study of Salman Rushdie’s Midnight’s Children (1981).” Journal of Alternative Perspectives in the Social Sciences, vol. 1, no. 2, 2009, pp. 498–522.
Earth. Directed by Deepa Mehta, 1998. IMDb, www.imdb.com/title/tt0150433/.
Fogel, Jackson D. Magical Realism and Revolution in Postcolonial Literature: A Study of Salman Rushdie’s “Midnight’s Children.” Millersville University, 2023. JSTOR, https://jstor.org/stable/community.39483104.
Hanbeh, Mohammed Omer Ali, and Shaikh Samad. “HOMI BHABHA: NATION IS NARRATION, NARRATION IS NATION.” Literary Cognizance, 2025.
Hasan, Mahmud Al. “Earth (1947): A Testimony of Communal Violence and Fanaticism.” Language in India, vol. 24, no. 4, Apr. 2024, pp. 96–105.
Luburić-Cvijanović, Arijana, and Nina Muždeka. “Salman Rushdie from Postmodernism and Postcolonialism to Cosmopolitanism: Toward a Global(ized) Literature?” Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction, vol. 57, no. 4, 2016, pp. 433–447.
Neutill, Rani. “Bending Bodies, Borders and Desires in Bapsi Sidhwa's Cracking India and Deepa Mehta's Earth.” South Asian Popular Culture, vol. 8, no. 1, 2010, pp. 73–87.
Nikam, Sudhir, and Prakash Navgire. “Postmodern Reading of Salman Rushdie's Midnight’s Children: A Critical Study.” IJELLH, vol. 7, no. 3, Mar. 2019, pp. 869–904.
Qureshi, Bilal. “THE DISCOMFORTING LEGACY OF DEEPA MEHTA’S EARTH.” Film Quarterly, vol. 70, no. 4, 2017, pp. 77–82. JSTOR, https://www.jstor.org/stable/26413812.
Raj, Sony Jalarajan, and Rohini Sreekumar. “Bollywood, Mobility and Partition Politics: Representation of Displaced Muslims in Films on Indo-Pak Partition.” Migration, Dislocation and Movement on Screen, edited by Ruxandra Trandafoiu, Berghahn Books, 2024, pp. 122–43.
REGE, JOSNA E. “VICTIM INTO PROTAGONIST? ‘MIDNIGHT’S CHILDREN’ AND THE POST-RUSHDIE NATIONAL NARRATIVES OF THE EIGHTIES.” Studies in the Novel, vol. 29, no. 3, 1997, pp. 342–75. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/29533221.
Rushdie, Salman. Midnight’s Children. Jonathan Cape, 1981.
Shaikh, Suhel Samad, and Ajay Sahebrao Deshmukh. “Representing Nation via Narrative Strategies: Homi K Bhabha's Reflections on Ambivalence of Nation.” ResearchGate, Nov. 2022.
Varshney, Ashutosh. “Contested Meanings: India’s National Identity, Hindu Nationalism, and the Politics of Anxiety.” Daedalus, vol. 122, no. 3, 1993, pp. 227–61. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/20027190.
Williams, Sebastian. “Silence and Mediation: Narrative Form in Bapsi Sidhwa's Cracking India.” South Asian Review, vol. 40, no. 1–2, 2019, pp. 20–33.
Yadav, Pankaj. “Nation, Identity and Hybridity in Salman Rushdie’s Midnight’s Children: A Postcolonial Study.” Journal of Advance and Future Research, vol. 4, issue 5, May 2026, pp. 97–102.
No comments:
Post a Comment